My Photo

About This Blog


  • This BLOG has a double purpose. It aims to contribute to the discussion and development of the academic field that could be situated in between complexity theory, knowledge management, innovation and learning; in summary a more holistic and systemic approach to management. As such it reflects the activities that take place in the Euromed transversal research track on this subject. The Home Page and the Reading host this contribution. In the News and Discussion sections, this BLOG is used to animate courses in the area of “Complexity and the Networked Economy”, "Knowledge Management and Learning" and "A quantum interpreation of business".

    More about Blogs........

Associate Researcher

Pedagogical concepts

Tools

Contact

« November 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

Science and the taboo of Psi

Dean Radin gave beginning January a lecture on Science and the taboo of Psi for Google. Interesting stuff, as you can imagine.  But equally interesting are some observations of Dean about Google. Google is rated as one of the best places to work.  They have free (gourmet) food available, 24/7, lots of snack bars (with healthy food) scattered around the campus, free massage at work during the work day, a meditation room, etc. Amazing is it? Or isn't it. Should we just start opening our eyes for things that we know already for a while in science and just start applying them in our business environment ?

Knowledge Management needs a different philosophical perspective

I have started again with my most favorite course (Knowledge management and management learning: the biology of business) that I am doing together with my wife Erna. For the students, the first few powerpoints are available on the readings page. At the same time I have taken over from a colleague the fundamental in Management in Complexity, a course that I have been doing for a number of years but stopped a few years ago.  In fact, my book "Organisational learning and knowledge technologies in a dynamic environment"  (1998) was the first version of my course book. It has evolved ever since.

I understood better that knowledge is less of a technological matter (though that was already argued in that book).  It is more about the purpose of business, the network of cooperating people (that are willing to share and co-create) and above all of a different philosophical perspective.

I can suggest a very interesting article in that respect of Ed Weymes (Waikato Management School): A challenge to traditional management theory.  According to him, the historic and possibly arcane purpose of business, to maximize shareholder wealth, is no longer a relevant proposition.  It is according to him timely to reflect on the purpose of business as adding value to society and rejecting the focus on accumulation of personal wealth.

Knowledge-creating enterprises (according to Ed) are founded on the development of sustainable relationships within the organisation and with stakeholders and thus require a different philosophical perspective.